Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on the manager.

For the second time this season, Blue Jays manager Charlie Montoyo called for his hitter to bunt in extra innings with two strikes, and Santiago Espinal struck out on a bunt attempt into foul territory.

With runners on first and second base with nobody out in the bottom of the 11th inning, the Blue Jays squandered a golden opportunity to put the Tampa Bay Rays away in the series opener. Instead, they lost 9-7 in 12 innings.

It might seem odd to nitpick on one particular play from that game, but that 11th inning at bat with Espinal at the plate is where things fell apart for the Blue Jays.

Montoyo put on the bunt for Espinal (which he is known to do), but the problem is everybody in the ballpark knows that once the Blue Jays manager puts on the bunt sign, his hitters have every chance to lay the bunt down, including with two strikes.

This happened once before earlier this season on April 1 when Danny Jansen struck out in extra innings while trying to lay down a bunt. He made three unsuccessful attempts and struck out, and despite Jansen’s feeble attempt at plating a run, the Blue Jays won anyway over the Yankees, 3-2.

This time around, they weren’t so lucky as the Rays stormed back the following inning courtesy of a go-ahead grand slam by Rays catcher Francisco Mejia. By that point, the Blue Jays had used up all good will they earned with the baseball gods, it seems.

Calling for a sacrifice bunt in extra innings isn’t uncommon (there have been 25 attempts this season), but only four sacrifice bunt attempts in extra innings with two strikes; and two of those instances belong to the Blue Jays.

For whatever reason, Montoyo seems to love the sacrifice bunt play, as the Blue Jays had the fourth-most sacrifice bunt attempts in the American League in 2020 and the third-most successful sacrifice bunts in the AL.

A sacrifice bunt is a baseball fundamental which managers should trust their position players to lay down at any given moment. But with the game on the line in extra innings two two strikes against a hitter, doesn’t it make sense to let the hitter try to put the ball in play?

Especially for a hitter like Espinal who can get the bat on the ball. His .303 BABIP ranks seventh on the team among Blue Jays with 30 or more plate appearances this season.

Advancing the runner at second base an extra ninety feet in extra innings is paramount for the team at the plate, but should it come at the expense of someone at the plate winning the game with one swing of the bat?

If ever there was a time to call for a sacrifice bunt, it would be in extra innings with nobody out and the go-ahead run at second base. But the calculus suddenly changes when the batter goes to two strikes. That doesn’t seem to faze Montoyo, who left the bunt sign 0n anyway and Espinal struck out on his third bunt attempt.

I’m not against the sacrifice bunt play as a concept (it always has its time and place), but unless you’re confident your hitter can lay one down with 100% certainty, a bunt attempt in a two strike count is always ill-advised.

Sure, it’s only one game of 162. But it was a squandered opportunity by the Blue Jays — and there were many junctures in that game when they could have overcome their shortcomings and won.

But when the manager doesn’t put the team in the best position to win like Montoyo did in the 11th inning, it’s an uphill battle to claw back and win the game.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here